Combating Scientific Misconduct: The Role of Focused Workshops in Changing Attitudes Towards Plagiarism
Farooq Azam Rathorea b c d✉, Noor E Fatimaa b c d, Fareeha Farooqa b c d, Sahibzada Nasir Mansoora b c d
- aDepartment of Rehabilitation Medicine, PNS Shifa Hospital, DHA II, Karachi 75500, Pakistan
- bDepartment of Biochemistry, Sir Syed Medical College for Girls, Karachi
- cDepartment of Medicine, CMH Lahore Medical College and Institute of Dentistry, Shami Road, Lahore Cantt
- dDepartment of Rehabilitation Medicine, Combined Military Hospital, Panoaqil, Pakistan
- ✉Corresponding author
Papers open inside SciRah from the original publisher or repository; SciRah never hosts them.
Abstract
Introduction Scientific misconduct is a global issue. There is low awareness among health professionals regarding plagiarism, particularly in developing countries, including Pakistan. There is no formal training in the ethical conduct of research or writing for under- and post-graduate students in the majority of medical schools in Pakistan. Internet access to published literature has made plagiarism easy. The aim of this study was to document the effectiveness of focused workshops on reducing scientific misconduct as measured using a modified version of the attitude towards plagiarism questionnaire (ATPQ) assessment tool. Materials and methods A cross-sectional study was conducted with participants of workshops on scientific misconduct. Demographic data were recorded. A modified ATPQ was used as a pre- and post-test for workshop participants. Data were entered in SPSS v20 (IBM< Armonk, NY, US). Frequencies and descriptive statistics were analyzed. An independent sample t-test was run to analyze differences in mean scores on pre-workshop ATPQ and differences in mean scores on post-test scores. Results There were 38 males and 42 females (mean age: 26.2 years) who participated in the workshops and completed the pre- and post-assessments. Most (59; 73.75%) were final-year medical students. One-third (33.8%) of the respondents had neither attended workshops related to ethics in medical research nor published manuscripts in medical journals (32.5%). More than half (55%) admitted witnessing unethical practices in research. There was a significant improvement in attitudes toward plagiarism after attending the workshop (mean difference = 7.18 (6.2), t = 10.32, P < .001). Conclusions Focused workshops on how to detect and avoid scientific misconduct can help increase knowledge and improve attitudes towards plagiarism, as assessed by the modified ATPQ. Students, residents, and faculty members must be trained to conduct ethical medical research and avoid all forms of scientific misconduct.
TL;DRFocused workshops on how to detect and avoid scientific misconduct can help increase knowledge and improve attitudes towards plagiarism, as assessed by the modified ATPQ. (Semantic Scholar)