S. Goossens

Most-cited papers

1. Planned Cesarean or planned vaginal delivery for twins: secondary analysis of randomized controlled trial

   M. Zafarmand, S. Goossens, P. Tajik, P. Bossuyt +305 more

   2019Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology24 citations Open access

   Semantic Scholar

   Save

2. Comparison of planned caesarean delivery and planned vaginal delivery in women with a twin pregnancy: A nation wide cohort study.

   S. Goossens, S. Ensing, M. A. van der Hoeven, F. Roumen +2 more

   2018European Journal of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Biology24 citations

   Semantic Scholar

   Save

3. Effects on developmental outcomes after cesarean birth versus vaginal birth in Chinese children aged 1–59 months: a cross-sectional community-based survey

   Hong Zhou, Yuan Ding, Yuning Yang, Si-Yu Zou +327 more

   2019PeerJ13 citations Open access

   Semantic Scholar

   Save

4. Clinical indicators associated with the mode of twin delivery: an analysis of 22,712 twin pairs.

   S. Goossens, C. Hukkelhoven, Lotte W. de Vries, B. Mol +2 more

   2015European Journal of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Biology11 citations Open access

   Semantic Scholar

   Save

5. Cervical cerclage for prevention of preterm birth: the results from A 20-year cohort

   M. W. E. Frenken, S. Goossens, Minke C R Janssen, L. Mulders +1 more

   2022Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Research5 citations Open access

   Semantic Scholar

   Save

6. Neurodevelopmental outcome of twins at two years of age according to the planned mode of delivery

   Ghislaine M M Dekeunink, S. Goossens, van der Garde Matthijs, Rachel H J Senden +2 more

   2015Journal of Maternal-Fetal & Neonatal Medicine5 citations

   Semantic Scholar

   Save

7. Neonatal outcomes according to actual delivery mode after planned vaginal delivery in women with a twin pregnancy.

   S. Goossens, S. Ensing, F. Roumen, J. Nijhuis +1 more

   2020European Journal of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Biology4 citations Open access

   Semantic Scholar

   Save

8. The Cost Implications in Ontario, Alberta, and British Columbia of Early Versus Delayed External Cephalic Version in the Early External Cephalic Version 2 (EECV2) Trial.

   Rashid J. Ahmed, Amiram Gafni, E. K. Hutton, E. K. Hutton +172 more

   2016Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Canada3 citations

   Semantic Scholar

   Save

9. Planning the mode of delivery for twin pregnancies: A web-based questionnaire

   S. Goossens, F. Roumen, J. Derks, F. Kessels +2 more

   2016Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Research3 citations Open access

   Semantic Scholar

   Save

10. [Vaginal delivery safe for twins starting at 32 weeks?].

    S. Goossens, B. Mol, J. Nijhuis, F. Roumen

    2014Nederlandsch tijdschrift voor geneeskunde3 citations

    Semantic Scholar

    Save

11. Second‐trimester cervical length as risk indicator for Cesarean delivery in women with twin pregnancy

    L. van de Mheen, E. Schuit, S. Liem, A. Lim +15 more

    2015Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology2 citations Open access

    Semantic Scholar

    Save

12. Training and practical issues of breech and twin deliveries in the Netherlands.

    S. Goossens, Beau R G M Speck, L. Bullens, S. E. Truijens +1 more

    2018European Journal of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Biology1 citations

    Semantic Scholar

    Save

13. 222: Personalizing twin delivery management: A secondary analysis of a randomized clinical trial comparing planned caesarean or planned vaginal delivery

    M. Zafarmand, S. Goossens, P. Tajik, P. Bossuyt +6 more

    20181 citations Open access

    Semantic Scholar

    Save

14. Twin pregnancies: planning the mode of delivery

    S. Goossens

    20170 citations

    Semantic Scholar

    Save

15. Vaginale baring veilig voor tweeling vanaf 32 weken

    S. Goossens, B. W. Mol, J. Nijhuis, F. Roumen

    20140 citations

    Semantic Scholar

    Save