Human-centricity, sustainability, and resilience are the core pillars of the Industry 5.0 concept. The human-centric perspective emphasizes the development of socio-technical systems designed to enhance human health, safety, and well-being while fostering sustainable practices that benefit society at large. This paper presents a systematic literature review to identify the key characteristics of human-centered work environments. The findings reveal growing interest in human factors and ergonomics, with notable gaps in cognitive ergonomics requiring further attention. Beyond ensuring safety and health, human-centric systems must address cognitive workload and well-being to maintain productivity, efficiency, and motivation, which are closely tied to a company’s market performance. This study provides valuable insights for both scientific and industrial stakeholders, outlining the principles and requirements essential for the effective implementation of human-centric systems.

Systems human factors and ergonomics (HFE) methods are increasingly being applied to diverse problems across various domains. This scoping review identified peer‐reviewed applications of systems HFE methods to determine which methods have been applied, in what domains, and for what purposes. Four databases (Web of Science, Scopus, Science Direct, and Sage) were searched for articles that applied systems HFE methods. After applying a set of inclusion criteria, 367 peer‐reviewed articles were included in the review. The review revealed a growth in applications of systems HFE methods over time. Overall, cognitive work analysis (CWA) was the most frequently applied, closely followed by functional resonance analysis method (FRAM) and systems theoretic accident model and process–system‐theoretic process analysis (STAMP‐STPA). Most applications of systems HFE methods have occurred in the Healthcare domain, and approximately one‐third of the articles involved the application of multiple HFE methods, with an increasing number of these including mathematical modeling such as Systems Dynamics and Agent Based Modeling. The review suggests there is a continued demand for both qualitative and quantitative outputs in systems HFE applications. As problem spaces and system complexity continue to intensify, evaluation, and potential adaption of methods may be required, including using more than one method. The challenge of matching methods to problems continues. To select appropriate methods, consideration should be balanced between factors such as the type of system being examined, the effort required to apply the method(s), the level of complexity of the system, and the necessary output.

Abstract Contemporary society faces a growing set of complex global issues representing significant human health, well-being, and sustainability threats. Human Factors and Ergonomics (HFE) has a critical role to play in responding to these issues; however, there remain a set of grand challenges that require resolution. This paper presents and discusses six grand challenges for HFE and related key research thrust areas for each of the challenges. The grand challenges are (1) Evolution in Societal Thinking; (2) Future of Human Work in Industry 5.0; (3) Climate Change and Sustainability; (4) Future of Education and Training; (5) Future of Personalized Health, and (6) Life, Technology, and the Metaverse. These grand challenges and key research thrust areas were derived by twenty HFE professionals who are the authors of this paper. The implications of these grand challenges for education, training, research, and implementation of HFE principles and methods for the benefit of humankind are discussed.

Human Factors and Ergonomics (HF/E) play an essential role in the development of sustainable manufacturing systems. By prioritizing worker wellbeing through the mitigation of occupational hazards and the enhancement of workplace health, HF/E contributes significantly to improved system performance. In accordance with the principles of Industry 5.0 and Society 5.0, which emphasize human-centered design and wellbeing, organizations that effectively integrate HF/E principles can achieve a competitive advantage on the market. Based on a globally recognized ranking system utilized by investors in making informed decisions, the study focuses on manufacturing companies ranked by their occupational health and safety (OHS) scores, a key criterion for assessing the social dimension of company performance. This research aims to identify and analyze top-ranked companies that explicitly highlight HF/E-related benefits within their public documents and sustainability reports. The paper investigates aspects related to the integration of AI and digital technologies to enhance safety and health in manufacturing systems, with a specific focus on human presence detection in hazardous zones, improvements in machines and equipment design, occupational risk assessments, and initiatives for enhancing worker wellbeing. The findings are expected to provide compelling evidence for companies to prioritize HF/E consideration during the design and redesign phases of sustainable manufacturing systems. The paper provides significant value to non-indexed companies by offering a dual approach for improving OHS performance, based on an empirical evaluation assessment method and practical strategies for effective OHS implementation in different manufacturing industries and countries.

Abstract Human Factors and Ergonomics (HFE) originated in special domains such as military. However, it is unclear whether current HFE continues to address these domains. Here we examined trends in HFE research on special domains from 2011 to 2023, using a 4S framework (special environments, machines, tasks, humans). Less than one-third of articles in Ergonomics and Human Factors targeted special domains, with healthcare, military, and aviation as the primary focuses. Nearly half of these studies were conducted in low-fidelity environments, with about 10% in real-world settings. Real machines and front-line operators were involved in 18.1% and about 50% of these studies, respectively, and skill-based tasks were predominant in experimental studies. Collaborative research between academia and industry accounted for one-third of these studies. Human Factors had a higher proportion of these studies, with 54.8% of first authors from the USA, compared to 23.3% in Ergonomics. Concerns regarding HFE research in special domains were discussed. PRACTITIONER SUMMARY We developed the 4S framework to characterise HFE studies published between 2011 and 2023. We present the results of a content and trend analysis, mapping the landscape of HFE research targeting special domains. Our framework provides insights for HFE researchers and practitioners to assess the ecological validity of contemporary HFE research.

Abstract Despite significant strides in linking Human Factors and Ergonomics (HFE) and sustainability, research lacks precision in debating HFE’s role, especially concerning the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). This paper maps concrete contributions of HFE to the SDGs, offering strategic actions for target achievement. The methodological approach involved the application of PRISMA to define a sample, SciMAT and VOSviewer for visual and temporal thematic mapping, deductive content analysis and categorical analysis. The results show that there is an already rich and unique set of contributions across a wide range of SDGs, not just the most common related to HFE, SDG8 (Decent work). The importance of HFE is highlighted in various aspects, such as the sustainable adoption of industry 4.0 technologies (SDG9) and the development of sustainable production (SDG12), energy (SDG7) and urban (SDG11) systems. Strategic actions specifying targets for each mapped SDG are offered for policymakers, industry professionals and researchers. PRACTITIONER SUMMARY This paper maps concrete contributions of HFE to the SDGs, including aspects such as sustainable adoption of industry 4.0 technologies and the development of sustainable production, energy and urban systems. Policymakers, industry professionals and researchers can benefit from the strategic pathways offered to further advance the SDGs.

Human factors and ergonomics (HFE) is an interdisciplinary field dedicated to understanding the interactions between humans and systems, with the goal of optimizing performance, safety, and well-being. This research article explores the theoretical foundations, practical applications, and future potential of HFE. Through comprehensive analysis, the study identifies key factors influencing human performance and ergonomics, highlights significant research findings, and discusses the implications for workplace design, product development, and system efficiency. The findings underscore the importance of designing for human capabilities and limitations, the role of technology in enhancing performance, and the need for a holistic approach to ergonomics. Practical recommendations for designers, engineers, and policymakers are provided, along with suggestions for future research to further advance the field. Keywords: Human Performance, Human Factors, Ergonomics, Optimization, Workplace Efficiency, User-Centered Design, Cognitive Ergonomics, Physical Ergonomics, Occupational Health, Human-Technology Interaction, System Design, Productivity, Safety and Comfort. References: Antle, D. M., & Miller, L. L. (2016). Chapter 29 Engaging Participants in Human Factors and Ergonomics. Human Factors and Ergonomics in Practice, 359–374.https://doi.org/10.1201/9781315587332-30 Catchpole, K., & Jeffcott, S. (2016). Chapter 13 Human Factors and Ergonomics Practice in Healthcare. Human Factors and Ergonomics in Practice, 181–192.https://doi.org/10.1201/9781315587332-14 Charness, N. (2014). Book Review: Reviews of Human Factors and Ergonomics,Volume 8: Health-Care Human Factors/Ergonomics. Ergonomics in Design: The Quarterly of Human Factors Applications, 22(3), 29–29.https://doi.org/10.1177/1064804614539457 Fidopiastisl, C., & Nicholson, D. (2010). Neuroergonomics, From Theory to Practice.Advances in Understanding Human Performance, 354–359.https://doi.org/10.1201/ebk1439835012-c36 Gantt, R., & Shorrock, S. (2016). Chapter 6 Human Factors and Ergonomics in the Media. Human Factors and Ergonomics in Practice, 77–93.https://doi.org/10.1201/9781315587332-7 Shorrock, S., & Williams, C. (2016). Chapter 1 Introduction Human Factors and Ergonomics in Practice. Human Factors and Ergonomics in Practice, 1–18.https://doi.org/10.1201/9781315587332-2 Waterson, P. (2016). Chapter 3 Ergonomics and Ergonomists Lessons for Human Factors and Ergonomics Practice from the Past and Present. Human Factors and Ergonomics in Practice, 29–44. https://doi.org/10.1201/9781315587332-4

The integration of Human Factors and Ergonomics (HFE) into emergency responses is crucial due to frequent human errors and inadequate human-system interactions which impede effective emergency and disaster management. Therefore, this research aims to develop and validate the Smart All-hazards Response Framework (SARF) that systematically incorporates HFE principles across all aspects of disaster management, from planning through post-response analysis. The framework focuses on reducing human errors, enhancing human-system interactions, and boosting system resilience. The research methodology includes a detailed literature review, the development of the HFE-integrated framework, and rigorous testing through experimental studies and simulations across various scenarios. Key questions address the integration of HFE to optimize system performance and the impact of ergonomic interventions on responder safety in high-risk environments. By advancing a holistic, human-centered approach to emergency and disaster management, this study aims to significantly enhance the effectiveness, safety, and adaptability of responses to all kinds of hazards.

The healthcare system is one of the keys to sustainable development and has historically embraced the social pillar of environmental, social and governance (ESG) efforts, caring for patients and medical employees. Since the human factor and ergonomics (HFE) is part of the social efforts, integration of the HFE into the process and quality management system might create a new discourse also for management of patient safety system. Hence the integration of HFE in patient safety with the ESG framework is a current and evolving field of study. Aim of the research is to investigate scientific literature on the field of HFE in Patient Safety and ESG framework in order to develop systematic literature review on how to develop sustainable patient safety with HFE integration with ESG framework. Systematic literature review was performed during the study, using monographic and PRISMA method guidelines. Research results show that sustainable development is one of the key issues in the healthcare industry. Human Factors and Ergonomics (HFE) scientific researches in patient safety have addressed various contemporary factors, including technology use, human errors and its role in patient safety, work efficiency and work abilities in patient safety a.o. Integrating HFE in patient safety with the ESG framework can lead to a holistic approach towards improving patient safety and healthcare outcomes and most importantly – provide sustainable patient safety. This integration can help healthcare organizations manage risks and opportunities related to environmental, social, and governance criteria, hence improving the overall wellbeing of patients and at the same time also for healthcare workers.

This is the fifth updated and extended edition (including the following sections: About the Editors, Contributors, Foreword, Preface, 57 chapters of the main text, Index) of Handbook of Human Factors and Ergonomics newly revised and edited by Dr Gavriel Salvendy (UniversityDistinguishedProfessor at theCollege of Engineering and Computer Science at the University of Central Florida, USA) and Dr Waldemar Karwowski (Pegasus Professor and Chairman of the Department of Industrial Engineering and Management Systems and Executive Director of the Institute for Advanced Systems Engineering at the University of Central Florida, USA). The Editors have successfully integrated material received from 142 selected authors, who are recognized experts representing leading centers in human factors and ergonomics (HFE) all over the world. The authors have compiled the information from 10,193 references, and presented 619 figures and 260 tables. Their effort resulted in amassive volume; hardback copy mass is 2.9 kg, so for ergonomic reasons the epdf should be recommended for everyday use. Themain text has been arranged into nine thematic groups of chapters: ‘1. Human Factors Function’ (two chapters); ‘2. Human Factors Fundamentals’ (eight chapters); ‘3. Design of Equipment, Tasks, Jobs, and Environments’ (seven chapters); ‘4. Design for Health, Safety, and Comfort’ (eight chapters); ‘5. Human Performance Modeling’ (six chapters); ‘6. System Evaluation’ (three chapters); ‘7. Human–Computer Interaction’ (11 chapters); ‘8. Design for Individual Differences’ (4 chapters); and ‘9. Select Applications’ (eight chapters). Every chapter presents the up-to-date state of the art in the area it covers, including rapidly expanding new fields of HFE, i.e., modeling and simulation of human systems, man–machine/robot systems, artificial intelligence, data analysis, information technology and cyber security in HFE. The content of each chapter is a complete unit, so it can be studied independently. Thus, the book is of a comprehensive, encyclopedic type, because the extensive Index of terms (46 pp.) enables easy tracking and identification of the required subject. Handbook of Human Factors and Ergonomics could be recommended for a very broad audience: from beginners to experts. But, it should be specifically recommended as a textbook for students taking courses in biomechanics, physiology, psychology and sociology; as well as a handbook for researchers and/or professionals in all these branches of contemporary HFE.

Abstract Industry 4.0 revolution has brought rapid technological growth and development in manufacturing industries. Technological development enables efficient manufacturing processes and brings changes in human work, which may cause new threats to employee well-being and challenge their existing skills and knowledge. Human factors and ergonomics (HF/E) is a scientific discipline to optimize simultaneously overall system performance and human well-being in different work contexts. The aim of this scoping review is to describe the state-of-the-art of the HF/E research related to the industry 4.0 context in manufacturing. A systematic search found 336 research articles, of which 37 were analysed utilizing a human-centric work system framework presented in the HF/E literature. Challenges related to technological development were analysed in micro- and macroergonomics work system frameworks. Based on the review we frame characteristics of an organisation level maturity model to optimize overall sociotechnical work system performance in the context of rapid technological development in manufacturing industries.