Comparative Analysis of Fluorescence In Situ Hybridization and Real Time Polymerase Chain Reaction in Diagnosis of Chronic Myeloid Leukemia.
Javaid Alia, Saleem Ahmed Khanb, Shan E Raufc, Muhammad Ayyubd, Nadir Alie, Nabeel Khan Afridif
- aDepartment of Pathology, Combined Military Hospital, Pano Aqil
- bDepartment of Pathology, Army Medical College, Rawalpindi
- cDepartment of Pathology, Combined Military Hospital, Thal, FATA
- dDepartment of Pathology, Armed Forces Institute of Pathology, Rawalpindi
- eDepartment of Pathology, Combined Military Hospital, Peshawar
- fDepartment of Pathology, Combined Military Hospital, Gilgit
Papers open inside SciRah from the original publisher or repository; SciRah never hosts them.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To compare the sensitivity and specificity of fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) with real time polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) in the diagnosis of Chronic Myeloid Leukemia (CML). STUDY DESIGN: A cross-sectional, analytical study. PLACE AND DURATION OF STUDY: Haematology Department, Armed Forces Institute of Pathology, Rawalpindi, from January 2012 to February 2014. METHODOLOGY: A total number of 87 patients of CML were studied. The diagnosis was made on the basis of clinical history, peripheral blood and bone marrow aspiration. These patients were tested for the presence of BCR-ABL1 fusion gene by RT-PCR and FISH. About 5 ml of venous blood was collected, half was taken in heparin for FISH and half in ethylenediamine tetra-acetic acid (EDTA) for CBC and PCR. For FISH, cells were cultured for 24 hours in RPMI 1640 medium and evaluated using BX51 fluorescence microscope for dual fusion signal of yellow colour. Samples having 20 or more interphases positive for dual fusion signals were taken as positive. For PCR, RNA extraction was done by Tri-Reagent LS (MRC, USA) and cDNA was synthesized using reverse transcriptase and gene specific primer. RT-PCR was done on ABI-7500. The positive samples were identified when fluorescence exceeded threshold limit. Results of RT-PCR and FISH were compared. RESULTS: Out of the 87 patients, 85 (97.7%) were PCR positive and 2 (2.3%) were PCR negative, whereas in FISH 83 (95.4%) were positive and 4 (4.5%) were negative. Sensitivity and specificity of FISH was 97.6% and 100%, respectively. CONCLUSION: FISH is a reliable supplementary method to PCR for detection of BCR-ABL1 fusion gene in the diagnosis of CML.

