Evidence of interventions for the risk of dry eye in critically ill patients: An integrative review
Caroline Fernandes Souza Macêdo de Françaa b, Ana Paula Nunes de Lima Fernandesa b, Diana Paula de Souza Rêgo Pinto Carvalhoa b, Suênia Silva de Mesquita Xaviera b, Marcos Antônio Ferreira Júniorb c✉, Fabiane Rocha Botarellia b, Allyne Fortes Vítora b
- aFederal University of Rio Grande do Norte/UFRN, Natal (RN), Brazil
- bFederal University of Rio Grande Do Norte, UFRN Natal‐RN Brazil
- cFederal University of Rio Grande do Norte/UFRN, Natal (RN), Brazil. Electronic address: marcos_nurse@hotmail.com
- ✉Corresponding author
Papers open inside SciRah from the original publisher or repository; SciRah never hosts them.
Abstract
Aims: Identify the best scientific evidence available to eye care in order to prevent dry eye. Method: Review study conducted according to the three steps of the evidence-based practice, guided by the following question, grounded in the Patient, Intervention, Comparison, and Outcome strategy: "What is the best scientific evidence available to eye care related to preventing dry eye?" Two databases were used, the web portal Medical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System Online and two digital libraries. Data were organized by using three structured forms. Results: Ten studies made up the final sample, in English, with evidence levels between I and III. The results pointed out differences regarding the best or most appropriate occlusion and ocular lubrication methods to prevent dry eye. Conclusion: Several care methods showed strong scientific evidence to prevent dry eye, related to occlusion and ocular lubrication. There is a need for further studies to determine the strength of this evidence.
TL;DRSeveral care methods showed strong scientific evidence to prevent dry eye, related to occlusion and ocular lubrication. (Semantic Scholar)

