Types of Communications Technology and Civil Conflict
Tushar Bharatia b✉, Michael Jetterb c d e, Muhammad Nauman Malik
- aUniversity of Western Australia, 35 Stirling Highway, Crawley, Crawley, WA 6009, Australia
- bUniversity of Western Australia
- cIZA, HOME PAGE:, http://www.iza.org/en/webcontent/personnel/photos/index_html?key=8715
- dUniversity of Western Australia, 35 Stirling Highway, Crawley, Western Australia 6009, AUSTRALIA
- eIZA
- ✉Corresponding author
Papers open inside SciRah from the original publisher or repository; SciRah never hosts them.
Abstract
Any opinions expressed in this paper are those of the author(s) and not those of IZA. Research published in this series may include views on policy, but IZA takes no institutional policy positions. The IZA research network is committed to the IZA Guiding Principles of Research Integrity. The IZA Institute of Labor Economics is an independent economic research institute that conducts research in labor economics and offers evidence-based policy advice on labor market issues. Supported by the Deutsche Post Foundation, IZA runs the world’s largest network of economists, whose research aims to provide answers to the global labor market challenges of our time. Our key objective is to build bridges between academic research, policymakers and society. ABSTRACT This paper introduces a unifying theoretical framework to understand the relationship between different types of communications technology (CT) and the incidence of civil conflict. In our model, one-way CT allows the government to broadcast messages they use to (mis)inform dissidents about the size of the available rents. This decreases the dissident group’s marginal returns from fighting against the government. Two-way CT facilitates dialogue among dissident group members, helping them to overcome coordination issues and improve their chances of winning a fight against the government. The model predicts one-way CT decreases and two-way CT increases conflict incidence. Empirical evidence from country-level panel databases (studying up to 189 countries) and individual-level survey responses (from up to 74 countries) is consistent with these predictions. Radio and television penetration and usage are associated with diminished levels of civil conflict and anti-government attitudes. On the contrary, cell phone and internet penetration and usage correlate with greater likelihoods of conflict and higher anti-government sentiment. political system ranges from 1 (very bad) to 10 (very good). Confidence in the government takes values from 0 (none at all) to 3 (a great deal). All four CT variables have five (re-coded) responses: never (0), less than monthly (1), monthly (2), weekly (3), and daily (4). Control variables include individual-level measures of age, age 2 , marriage status, income, gender, education, religious affiliation, and employment status. World Values Survey waves 6 and 7 were conducted in years 2010-14 and 2017-2019, respectively.

