Global Patterns of Guild Composition and Functional Diversity of Spiders
Pedro Cardosoa b c✉, Stano Pekárd e, Rudy Jocquéf, Jonathan A. Coddingtonc g
- aSmithsonian Institution, National Museum of Natural History, Washington DC, United States of America. pcardoso@ennor.org
- bAzorean Biodiversity Group - CITA-A, Universidade dos Açores, Angra do Heroísmo, Portugal
- cSmithsonian Institution, National Museum of Natural History, Washington DC, United States of America
- dDepartment of Botany and Zoology, Faculty of Science, Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic
- eDepartment of Botany and Zoology Faculty of Science Masaryk University Brno Czech Republic
- fMusée Royal de l'Afrique Centrale, Tervuren, Belgium
Papers open inside SciRah from the original publisher or repository; SciRah never hosts them.
Abstract
The objectives of this work are: (1) to define spider guilds for all extant families worldwide; (2) test if guilds defined at family level are good surrogates of species guilds; (3) compare the taxonomic and guild composition of spider assemblages from different parts of the world; (4) compare the taxonomic and functional diversity of spider assemblages and; (5) relate functional diversity with habitat structure. Data on foraging strategy, prey range, vertical stratification and circadian activity was collected for 108 families. Spider guilds were defined by hierarchical clustering. We searched for inconsistencies between family guild placement and the known guild of each species. Richness and abundance per guild before and after correcting guild placement were compared, as were the proportions of each guild and family between all possible pairs of sites. Functional diversity per site was calculated based on hierarchical clustering. Eight guilds were discriminated: (1) sensing, (2) sheet, (3) space, and (4) orb web weavers; (5) specialists; (6) ambush, (7) ground, and (8) other hunters. Sixteen percent of the species richness corresponding to 11% of all captured individuals was incorrectly attributed to a guild by family surrogacy; however, the correlation of uncorrected vs. corrected guilds was invariably high. The correlation of guild richness or abundances was generally higher than the correlation of family richness or abundances. Functional diversity was not always higher in the tropics than in temperate regions. Families may potentially serve as ecological surrogates for species. Different families may present similar roles in the ecosystems, with replacement of some taxa by other within the same guild. Spiders in tropical regions seem to have higher redundancy of functional roles and/or finer resource partitioning than in temperate regions. Although species and family diversity were higher in the tropics, functional diversity seems to be also influenced by altitude and habitat structure.
TL;DRSpiders in tropical regions seem to have higher redundancy of functional roles and/or finer resource partitioning than in temperate regions, and functional diversity seems to be also influenced by altitude and habitat structure. (Semantic Scholar)