Recommended reporting items for epidemic forecasting and prediction research: The EPIFORGE 2020 guidelines
Simon Polletta, Michael A. Johanssonb, Nicholas G Reichc d, David M. Brett‐Majore, Sara Y. Del Vallef, Srinivasan Venkatramanang, Rachel Loweh i, Travis C. Porcoj, Irina Maljkovic Berrya, Alina Deshpandef, Moritz U. G. Kraemerk, David L. Blazes
Papers open inside SciRah from the original publisher or repository; SciRah never hosts them.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The importance of infectious disease epidemic forecasting and prediction research is underscored by decades of communicable disease outbreaks, including COVID-19. Unlike other fields of medical research, such as clinical trials and systematic reviews, no reporting guidelines exist for reporting epidemic forecasting and prediction research despite their utility. We therefore developed the EPIFORGE checklist, a guideline for standardized reporting of epidemic forecasting research. METHODS AND FINDINGS: We developed this checklist using a best-practice process for development of reporting guidelines, involving a Delphi process and broad consultation with an international panel of infectious disease modelers and model end users. The objectives of these guidelines are to improve the consistency, reproducibility, comparability, and quality of epidemic forecasting reporting. The guidelines are not designed to advise scientists on how to perform epidemic forecasting and prediction research, but rather to serve as a standard for reporting critical methodological details of such studies. CONCLUSIONS: These guidelines have been submitted to the EQUATOR network, in addition to hosting by other dedicated webpages to facilitate feedback and journal endorsement.
TL;DRThe EPIFORGE checklist is developed, a guideline for standardized reporting of epidemic forecasting research, to improve the consistency, reproducibility, comparability, and quality of epidemic forecast reporting. (Semantic Scholar)