Pupillometry and the vigilance decrement: Task‐evoked but not baseline pupil measures reflect declining performance in visual vigilance tasks
Joel T. Martina b c d✉, Annalise H. Whittakere f, Stephen J. Johnstonb d
- aDepartment of Psychology, University of York, United Kingdom, YO10 5DD
- bSchool of Human and Health Sciences, Department of Psychology, University of Swansea, Swansea, Wales, United Kingdom
- cDepartment of Psychology, University of York, York, UK
- dSchool of Human and Health Sciences, Department of Psychology, University of Swansea, Swansea, UK
- eDstl, Porton Down, Salisbury SP4 0JQ
- fPlatform Systems Division, Defence, Science and Technology Laboratory (Dstl), Porton Down, Salisbury, UK
- ✉Corresponding author
Papers open inside SciRah from the original publisher or repository; SciRah never hosts them.
Abstract
Baseline and task-evoked pupil measures are known to reflect the activity of the nervous system's central arousal mechanisms. With the increasing availability, affordability and flexibility of video-based eye tracking hardware, these measures may one day find practical application in real-time biobehavioural monitoring systems to assess performance or fitness for duty in tasks requiring vigilant attention. But real-world vigilance tasks are predominantly visual in their nature and most research in this area has taken place in the auditory domain. Here, we explore the relationship between pupil size-both baseline and task-evoked-and behavioural performance measures in two novel vigilance tasks requiring visual target detection: (1) a traditional vigilance task involving prolonged, continuous and uninterrupted performance (n = 28) and (2) a psychomotor vigilance task (n = 25). In both tasks, behavioural performance and task-evoked pupil responses declined as time spent on task increased, corroborating previous reports in the literature of a vigilance decrement with a corresponding reduction in task-evoked pupil measures. Also in line with previous findings, baseline pupil size did not show a consistent relationship with performance measures. Our data offer novel insights into the complex interplay of brain systems involved in vigilant attention and question the validity of the assumption that baseline (prestimulus) pupil size and task-evoked (poststimulus) pupil measures reflect the tonic and phasic firing modes of the locus coeruleus.
TL;DRIn two novel vigilance tasks requiring visual target detection, behavioral performance and task- evoked pupil responses declined as time spent on task increased, corroborating previous reports in the literature of a vigilance decrement with a corresponding reduction in task-evoked pupil measures. (Semantic Scholar)