Frequency of Publication and Topical Emphasis of Knowledge Management Books versus Doctoral Dissertations: 1983–2005
Keith A. Harmana, Alex A. Koohangb
- aNorthcentral University Prescott, Arizona 86301
- bUniversity of Wisconsin-Milwaukee Milwaukee, Wisconsin 53211
Papers open inside SciRah from the original publisher or repository; SciRah never hosts them.
Abstract
Citation analysis was used to collect data on the annual frequency and topical emphasis of books and doctoral dissertations on Knowledge Management (KM) published during the period 1983–2005. Chi-Square was used to compare KM books versus KM dissertations on the basis of frequency of publication and topical emphasis. Cramer's Phi was used to interpret the derived Chi-Square values' effect levels. Regarding annual frequency of publication, there was no significant difference between books and dissertations. KM books and dissertations followed a pattern of annual publication frequency similar to patterns reported in the literature. Regarding topical emphasis, there was a significant difference between books and dissertations. The analysis also supported a taxonomy or categorization model for topical emphasis reported in the literature. Recommendations for further study included: (1) citation analysis comparing the annual publication frequencies and topical emphasis of KM books, dissertations, and journal articles; (2) a bibliographic study comparing the types of sources cited in KM books, dissertations, and journal articles; and (3) additional studies on the categorization of the topics covered in KM books, dissertations, and journal articles. The study findings reflect: (1) KM's recent emergence as a generally accepted field of study and (2) key topics or KM constructs that merit greater attention by theorists and practitioners.
TL;DRKM's recent emergence as a generally accepted field of study and key topics or KM constructs that merit greater attention by theorists and practitioners are reflected. (Semantic Scholar)

