Serology: a robust indicator of malaria transmission intensity?
P. Corrana b, P. Colemana, E. Rileya, C. Drakeleya c✉
- aDepartment of Infectious and Tropical Diseases, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine (LSHTM), Keppel St, London, WC1E 7HT, UK
- bBiotherapeutics Division, National Institute for Biological Standards and Control, Herts, EN6 3QG, UK
- cJoint Malaria Program, Kilimanjaro Christian Medical Centre, Box 2228, Moshi, Tanzania
- ✉Corresponding author
Papers open inside SciRah from the original publisher or repository; SciRah never hosts them.
Abstract
To estimate the burden of malarial disease, and evaluate the likely effects of control strategies, requires reliable predictions of malaria transmission intensity. It has long been suggested that antimalarial antibody prevalences could provide a more accurate estimate of transmission intensity than traditional measures such as parasite prevalence or entomological inoculation rates, but there has been no systematic evaluation of this approach. Now, the availability of well characterized malarial antigens allows us to test whether serological measurements provide a practical method for estimating transmission. Here we present a suggested methodology, highlight the advantages and shortcomings of serological measurements of malaria transmission and identify areas in which further work is desirable.
TL;DRThe availability of well characterized malarial antigens allows us to test whether serological measurements provide a practical method for estimating transmission, and highlight the advantages and shortcomings ofserological measurements of malaria transmission. (Semantic Scholar)