Exploration of phytochemical compounds against Marburg virus using QSAR, molecular dynamics, and free energy landscape
Ali Ahmed Rabaana b c d✉, Muhammad Abdulrahman Halwanie, Mohammed Ahmed Garoutf, Jawaher Alotaibig, Bashayer Mohammed Alshehailh, Nouf E. Alotaibii, Souad A. Almuthreej, Ahmad A. Alshehrik, Mohammed Abdulrahman Alshahranik, Basim A. Othmanl, Abdulaziz Alqahtanim
- aCollege of Medicine, Alfaisal University, 11533, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. arabaan@gmail.com
- bDepartment of Public Health and Nutrition, The University of Haripur, Haripur, 22610, Pakistan. arabaan@gmail.com
- cMolecular Diagnostic Laboratory, Johns Hopkins Aramco Healthcare, 31311, Dhahran, Saudi Arabia. arabaan@gmail.com
- dMolecular Diagnostic Laboratory, Johns Hopkins Aramco Healthcare, 31311, Dhahran, Saudi Arabia
- eDepartment of Medical Microbiology, Faculty of Medicine, Al Baha University, 4781, Al Baha, Saudi Arabia
- fDepartment of Community Medicine and Health Care for Pilgrims, Faculty of Medicine, Umm Al-Qura University, 21955, Makkah, Saudi Arabia
- gInfectious diseases Unit, Department of Medicine, King Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research Center, 11564, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
- hPharmacy Practice Department, College of Clinical Pharmacy, Imam Abdulrahman Bin Faisal University, 31441, Dammam, Saudi Arabia
- iClinical pharmacy Department, College of Pharmacy, Umm Al-Qura University, 21955, Makkah, Saudi Arabia
Papers open inside SciRah from the original publisher or repository; SciRah never hosts them.
Abstract
Marburg virus disease (MVD) is caused by the Marburg virus, a one-of-a-kind zoonotic RNA virus from the genus Filovirus. Thus, this current study employed AI-based QSAR and molecular docking-based virtual screening for identifying potential binders against the target protein (nucleoprotein (NP)) of the Marburg virus. A total of 2727 phytochemicals were used for screening, out of which the top three compounds (74977521, 90470472, and 11953909) were identified based on their predicted bioactivity (pIC50) and binding score (< - 7.4 kcal/mol). Later, MD simulation in triplicates and trajectory analysis were performed which showed that 11953909 and 74977521 had the most stable and consistent complex formations and had the most significant interactions with the highest number of hydrogen bonds. PCA (principal component analysis) and FEL (free energy landscape) analysis indicated that these compounds had favourable energy states for most of the conformations. The total binding free energy of the compounds using the MM/GBSA technique showed that 11953909 (ΔG TOTAL = - 30.78 kcal/mol) and 74977521 (ΔG TOTAL = - 30 kcal/mol) had the highest binding affinity with the protein. Overall, this in silico pipeline proposed that the phytochemicals 11953909 and 74977521 could be the possible binders of NP. This study aimed to find phytochemicals inhibiting the protein's function and potentially treating MVD.
TL;DRAI-based QSAR and molecular docking-based virtual screening proposed that the phytochemicals 11953909 and 74977521 could be the possible binders of NP, inhibiting the protein's function and potentially treating MVD. (Semantic Scholar)

