The incidence of sexually acquired reactive arthritis: a systematic literature review
Hayley J Denisona b✉, Elizabeth Mary Curtisc, Michael A. Clynesc, Collette Bromheadd, Elaine Margaret Dennisonb c, Rebecca Graingere
- aSchool of Biological Sciences, Victoria University of Wellington, Wellington, New Zealand. hayley.denison@vuw.ac.nz
- bSchool of Biological Sciences, Victoria University of Wellington, Wellington, New Zealand
- cMRC Lifecourse Epidemiology Unit, University of Southampton, Southampton, United Kingdom
- dCollege of Health, Massey University, Wellington, New Zealand
Papers open inside SciRah from the original publisher or repository; SciRah never hosts them.
Abstract
Reactive arthritis (ReA) is an inflammatory spondyloarthritis occurring after infection at a distant site. Chlamydia trachomatis is proposed to be the most common cause of ReA, yet the incidence of sexually acquired ReA (SARA) has not been well established. We therefore carried out a systematic literature review to collate and critically evaluate the published evidence regarding the incidence of SARA. MEDLINE and EMBASE databases were searched using free-text and MeSH terms relating to infection and ReA. The title and abstract of articles returned were screened independently by two reviewers and potentially relevant articles assessed in full. Data was extracted from relevant articles and a risk of bias assessment carried out using a validated tool. Heterogeneity of study methodology and results precluded meta-analysis. The search yielded a total of 11,680 articles, and a further 17 were identified from review articles. After screening, 55 papers were assessed in full, from which 3 met the relevant inclusion criteria for the review. The studies reported an incidence of SARA of 3.0–8.1 % and were found to be of low to moderate quality. More studies are required to address the lack of data regarding the incidence of SARA. Specific and sensitive classification criteria must be developed in order for consistent classification and valid conclusions to be drawn. In clinical practice, it is recommended clinicians discuss the possibility of ReA developing at the time of STI diagnosis and to encourage patients to return if they experience any relevant symptoms.
TL;DRA systematic literature review was carried out to collate and critically evaluate the published evidence regarding the incidence of sexually acquired ReA and found the studies reported an incidence of SARA of 3.0–8.1 % and were found to be of low to moderate quality. (Semantic Scholar)