Effectiveness of the HoloLens mixed-reality headset in minimally invasive surgery: a simulation-based feasibility study
Hasaneen Fathy Al Janabia, Abdüllatif Aydına, Sharanya Palaneera, N. Macchioneb, Ahmed Al‐Jabira, Muhammad Shamim Khana c, Prokar Dasgupta Aa c, Kamran Ahmedd e f✉
- aMRC Centre for Transplantation, Guy's Hospital, King's College London, 5th Floor Southwark Wing, London, SE1 9RT, UK
- bASST Santi Paolo e Carlo, Università degli Studi di Milano, Milan, Italy
- c
Papers open inside SciRah from the original publisher or repository; SciRah never hosts them.
Abstract
Background The advent of Virtual Reality technologies presents new opportunities for enhancing current surgical practice. Studies suggest that current techniques in endoscopic surgery are prone to disturbance of a surgeon’s visual-motor axis, influencing performance, ergonomics and iatrogenic injury rates. The Microsoft ® HoloLens is a novel head-mounted display that has not been explored within surgical innovation research. This study aims to evaluate the HoloLens as a potential alternative to conventional monitors in endoscopic surgery. Materials and methods This prospective, observational and comparative study recruited 72 participants consisting of novices ( n = 28), intermediate-level ( n = 24) and experts ( n = 20). Participants performed ureteroscopy, within an inflatable operating environment, using a validated training model and the HoloLens mixed-reality device as a monitor. Novices also completed the assigned task using conventional monitors; whilst the experienced groups did not, due to their extensive familiarity. Outcome measures were procedural completion time and performance evaluation (OSATS) score. A final evaluation survey was distributed amongst all participants. Results The HoloLens facilitated improved outcomes for procedural times (absolute difference, − 73 s; 95% CI − 115 to − 30; P = 0.0011) and OSAT scores (absolute difference, 4.1 points; 95% CI 2.9–5.3; P < 0.0001) compared to conventional monitors. Feedback evaluation demonstrated 97% of participants agreed or strongly agreed that the HoloLens will have a role in surgical education (mean rating, 4.6 of 5; 95% CI 4.5–4.8). Furthermore, 95% of participants agreed or strongly agreed that the HoloLens is feasible to introduce clinically and will have a role within surgery (mean rating, 4.4 of 5; 95% CI 4.2–4.5). Conclusion This study demonstrates that the device facilitated improved outcomes of performance in novices and was widely accepted as a surgical visual aid by all groups. The HoloLens represents a feasible alternative to the conventional setup, possibly by aligning the surgeon’s visual-motor axis.
TL;DRThis study demonstrates that the HoloLens represents a feasible alternative to the conventional setup, possibly by aligning the surgeon’s visual-motor axis and was widely accepted as a surgical visual aid by all groups. (Semantic Scholar)

