RF‐Shielding of Laser‐Cut Venous Stents: Calculations, Simulations, and Experiments
Lisa Reglera b✉, Felix Spretera b, Kian Tadjalli Mehra b, Niklas Verlohc d, Klaus Düringe f, Wibke Ullerc d, Michael Bocka b, Simon Reissa b
- aDivision of Medical Physics, Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Medical Center Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine University of Freiburg Freiburg Germany
- bDivision of Medical Physics, Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Medical Center Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
- cDepartment of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Medical Center Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine University of Freiburg Freiburg Germany
- dDepartment of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Medical Center Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
- eAlaxo GmbH Wallgau Germany
- fAlaxo GmbH, Wallgau, Germany
- ✉Corresponding author
Papers open inside SciRah from the original publisher or repository; SciRah never hosts them.
Abstract
ABSTRACT Purpose To develop an analytical model of the RF‐shielding of laser‐cut venous stents for different orientations and stent geometries. Methods Laser‐cut venous stents are modeled as a grid composed of circular and rectangular loops. As these loops are orthogonal they shield different components of the transmit RF field. The shielding is calculated using Faraday's induction law, taking into account the self‐inductance and mutual coupling of circular and rectangular loops, and Biot–Savart's law. The shielding of 95 stent‐mimicking models was calculated, and numerical simulations and measurements were performed at both 1.5 and 3T for validation. Results The shielding of circular and rectangular loops differed by less than 3.3% and 10% between calculations, simulations, and measurements. The overall stent length had negligible impact on the shielding (< 8%). The combined shielding of both loop types showed deviations of less than 10% compared to stent models with varying cell sizes. Orienting the stents at an oblique angle other than 0° or 90° to B 0 , the model‐predicted shielding values deviated by less than 14%/10% from the measured values at 1.5 T/3 T. Conclusion The model allows for the calculation of the B 1 shielding of laser‐cut venous stents depending on their geometry and orientation relative to B 0 . Thus, it may help to adapt imaging parameters such as the flip angle to optimize monitoring of stent patency.

