COGNET-MD, an evaluation framework and dataset for Large Language Model benchmarks in the medical domain
Dimitrios P. Panagoulias, Persephone Papatheodosioua, Anastasios P. Palamidasb, Mattheos Sanoudosc, Evridiki Tsoureli‐Nikitaa, Maria K. Virvoud, George A. Tsihrintzisd
- aSchool of Medicine , National and Kapodistrian University of Athens , Athens , Greece
- bInterventional Pulmonology Department , Athens Medical Center , Greece
- cSchool of Dentistry , Department Of Orthodontics , National and Kapodistrian University of Athens , Athens , Greece
- dDepartment of Informatics , University of Piraeus , Piraeus 185 34 , Greece
Papers open inside SciRah from the original publisher or repository; SciRah never hosts them.
Abstract
Large Language Models (LLMs) constitute a breakthrough state-of-the-art Artificial Intelligence (AI) technology which is rapidly evolving and promises to aid in medical diagnosis either by assisting doctors or by simulating a doctor's workflow in more advanced and complex implementations. In this technical paper, we outline Cognitive Network Evaluation Toolkit for Medical Domains (COGNET-MD), which constitutes a novel benchmark for LLM evaluation in the medical domain. Specifically, we propose a scoring-framework with increased difficulty to assess the ability of LLMs in interpreting medical text. The proposed framework is accompanied with a database of Multiple Choice Quizzes (MCQs). To ensure alignment with current medical trends and enhance safety, usefulness, and applicability, these MCQs have been constructed in collaboration with several associated medical experts in various medical domains and are characterized by varying degrees of difficulty. The current (first) version of the database includes the medical domains of Psychiatry, Dentistry, Pulmonology, Dermatology and Endocrinology, but it will be continuously extended and expanded to include additional medical domains.
TL;DRThis technical paper outlines Cognitive Network Evaluation Toolkit for Medical Domains (COGNET-MD), which constitutes a novel benchmark for LLM evaluation in the medical domain and proposes a scoring-framework with increased difficulty to assess the ability of LLMs in interpreting medical text. (Semantic Scholar)